| On
the Hill
A Critical Look
at the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program
Senators Take a
New Look at the National Immunization Program
ACIP Votes
to Temporarily Revise Recommendations
Worth Repeating
Did
You Know?
Upcoming
Events
Back
to Every Child By Two Main Page
Back to
November/December Newsletter
|
On
the Hill
December 18, 2001
by Carol Ruppel
Today House and Senate conferees are negotiating
a final agreement on the conference report that will determine appropriations
for the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services and Education for
the rest of fiscal year 2002 that ends on September 30. The conferees
agreed to fund the National Immunization Program at $628 million.
This represents a total increase of $76 million. The House had requested
an increase of $47 million; the Senate, $84.5 million, so the compromise
is good news for immunization advocates.
The state immunization
grant program, authorized under Section 317 of the Public Health Services
Act, will receive an increase of about $22 million for the purchase of
vaccines, bringing the vaccine purchase appropriation to $222.3 million.
The 317 state grants received an increase of $19 million for program operations
and infrastructure, bringing that total to $200.7 million. Global
immunization activities received a $27 million increase for a total of
$133.8 million, and CDC received a $7 million increase for a total of $71.1
million to administer the National Immunization Program.
(The conference
committee had delayed its work until Congress completed reauthorization
of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, because of the direct effect
on education appropriations. One of the sticking points on that bill,
H.R. 1, was the federal contribution to funding students in special education.
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (P.L. 94-142) authorizes
a 40 percent federal match to states, but the federal match has never been
met. Some Members wanted to make special education an entitlement
program, but did not succeed. Overall federal education spending
will increase by $8 billion for fiscal year 2002.)
(Another sticking
point on the Labor/HHS/Education conference report has been the addition
of the Mental Health Parity Act (Wellstone/Domenici), which would require
health plans that already cover some mental health services to offer coverage
on parity with physical health services coverage. This is controversial
with some House members, both because of anticipated costs to employers
and because it is an authorizing piece amending an appropriations bill.
However there is strong Senate support to pass this amendment. At
this writing there is no word on whether the amendment is included in the
conference report.)
Once the conference
report is complete, it will go to each house for an up or down vote, and
then to the President to be signed into law.
Congress should
finally recess on December 21, having settled the remaining three appropriations
bills-Labor/HHS/Education, Defense and Foreign Operations.
The second session of the 107th Congress begins in late January, coinciding
with the President's State of the Union address. Meanwhile, the federal
agencies have been formulating their fiscal year 2003 budgets for submission
to the Office of Management and Budget. OMB "passes back" to the
agencies their respective proposals with OMB's changes, and the President
submits his budget shortly after his State of the Union. That begins
the Congressional budget process reconciling projected revenues with projected
overall federal spending. The appropriations process starts after
the House and Senate Budget Committees have set allocations for the 13
appropriations subcommittees. |